As we all know, Didier Deschamps was once firmly in the
running to become Liverpool manager in the not too distant past. If the former
World Cup winning captain keeps an eye on the reds these days then I reckon he
might be a little perplexed by one of Brendan Rodgers defensive selections.
The reigning France manager appears to be a big fan of
Mamadou Sakho who regularly starts for and has captained the French team under
Deschamps’ leadership. Highly regarded defenders like Eliaquim Mangala and
Laurent Koscielny are overlooked in favour of the ex PSG skipper currently
plying his trade at Anfield. I purposely use the word ‘currently’ because it’s
becoming increasingly likely to me that Sakho’s Liverpool career will be over
before too long.
Walking out on your team prior to any game, as Sakho did before
the Merseyside derby, is a stupid thing to do. The player was rightly
criticised and punished for his actions. He was bang out of order to abandon
Anfield when he wasn’t selected for that match and while I can never condone or
accept that kind of behaviour, I’m beginning to at least understand his misguided
petulance more every time I watch Liverpool’s comical attempts to defend this
season. One player’s performances in particular have left me empathising with
Sakho’s poor behaviour.
I wasn't a big advocate for signing Dejan Lovren in the
summer. The eventual £20m price tag made what seemed to be a somewhat unnecessary
transfer look downright foolish to me. I didn't understand why Liverpool were
looking to sign a player at such a high price to replace the newest and arguably
best centre half at the club. Sakho’s ungainly style unquestionably divides
opinion, but after his first season in English football his potential was evident
even if his consistency wasn’t. Quick, strong in the tackle and – crucially -
rarely bullied, I considered him as a player who could really go up a level or
two in the immediate future with some tweaks to his game. His front foot approach and ability to defend high up the pitch seemed to fit perfectly with Liverpool’s
playing style. He impressed in the World Cup this summer as well and it seemed
obvious to me that there was a lot more to come from the player going forward.
Brendan Rodgers clearly didn’t share this optimistic line of thinking.
Whatever anyone falsely claims about all centre backs being
able to play equally well on the left or the right hand side of defence, Dejan
Lovren was signed to play instead of Sakho. His sole season at Southampton (presumably
Liverpool signed him because of his performances during that campaign and
nothing he’d done prior to it as the club could have purchased Lovren for a
fraction of the cost from Lyon before he joined Saints) was played almost exclusively
in the left centre half position. In other words, Sakho’s position. That was
strange to me.
As I said, despite an
up and down début season at Anfield I looked at Sakho as a player could easily
go on to bigger and better things if he ironed out some of the kinks in his
game. Then I’d look at Martin Skrtel. Everyone knows what Skrtel is. We’ve seen
it for nearly seven years now so we’re fully aware; He’s a decent but flawed defender
and is unlikely to become anything more than that at this stage of his career.
At the end of last season Skrtel was the centre back that I
expected Rodgers to upgrade on during the summer transfer window. At the beginning
of the last campaign the manager looked as though he’d lost faith in the
Slovakian. Kolo Toure was starting games in his place before injuries allowed
Skrtel back into the side. To his credit, Skrtel scored a few goals and had an
okay season when he regained his place, but the same problems that existed in
his game five or six years ago still endured. Easily bullied by big target men,
rashness in the tackle, happier defending the edge of the box than pushing up, a
walking penalty at set pieces - why wouldn’t Rodgers have been looking to replace
Skrtel rather than the younger albeit more raw Sakho? Whatever his reasons, the
manager clearly identified the left of his central defence as the primary
problem area at the back.
As things stand today Skrtel and Lovren are the partnership
that will start games together for Liverpool when everyone is fit and available.
We’ve seen that already this season and this represents a huge problem for me. It’s
early days of course, but Dejan Lovren doesn’t look like a better option than the
dwindling version of Daniel Agger who fell out of favour with Rodgers last
season, let alone than Sakho.
Before I wrote this piece I looked back over the fourteen
goals Liverpool have conceded in the Champions League and Premier League to
date. Eight of those goals contained a significant involvement or mistake from
Lovren. From allowing forwards to easily run in behind him to score for Manchester
City and Ludogorets to losing a physical battle with Philippe Senderos on the
corner that led to Aston Villa’s winner at the Kop end, Lovren has made costly
error after costly error when you assess the goals this side have given away
this season. Even in Liverpool’s outstanding game of the campaign against Spurs,
Lovren twice made critical errors that should have resulted in goals against
his team. His blushes were spared on that day by a poor finish from Emmanuel
Adebayor and a great Simon Mignolet save from Nacer Chadli.
In a red shirt Lovren has been repeatedly rash. His passing
hasn’t been particularly impressive. He’s painfully slow on the turn and has little
speed in his legs – Roberto Soldado left him for dead in a foot race at White
Hart Lane last season. His judgement isn’t there either as shown by the penalty
he conceded against West Brom and his missed headed interception that preceded
QPR’s opening goal at Loftus Road. So forgive my negativity when I pose this
question, but what exactly does Dejan Lovren actually offer that Mamadou Sakho,
Kolo Toure, Martin Skrtel or even Daniel Agger didn’t last term?
When he joined the club we were repeatedly informed by
Rodgers and others in the press that Lovren was an exemplary leader. Sorry, but
shouting a bit and waving your arms doesn’t constitute leading. Liverpool’s
defensive line looks even less organised now than it did last season and he’s
not advanced the team’s cause in that respect in any discernible way. I also saw
lots of people claiming he’s a ‘beast’ which I understand is teenage speak for physically
imposing. Well, Bobby Zamora repeatedly bullied him at QPR as though he were a
school boy on Sunday so I guess the ‘beast’ theory now lies in tatters in the
bin. Plenty of excited Lovren advocates told me during the summer he was better on
the ball than Sakho or Skrtel. I don’t see this either. Often times he plays
people into trouble in midfield and if you aren’t having kittens whenever he
and Simon Mignolet exchange passes then I’ll need some of what you’re having
please.
Of course, while it would be ridiculous to lay the blame for
Liverpool’s defensive woes solely at the door of one player, I have to point out
that the extravagantly priced defensive signing looks as odd to me now as it
appeared back in August. Bar a decent début nothing has allayed the fears I had
regarding Lovren’s signing and his transfer fee.
To be fair, Lovren isn’t exactly surrounded by team mates who
inspire confidence or coherence. Whether it’s having to play next to a perennially distracted Jose Enrique who is likely to be day dreaming about his next online
FIFA tournament or having to protect a keeper who looks as confident as Jerzy
Dudek did whenever Manchester United rolled into town during the mid 2000s,
there are undoubtedly mitigating circumstances involved when it comes to Lovren’s
maladaptive start to Anfield life. However, all that being said, I need to see
something soon. Anything that will help me understand why we paid top dollar
for a player that the club wasn’t interested in at a third of the price just
twelve months prior to his eventual arrival in L4.
Rodgers talked Lovren up all summer long and has protected
him even at the expense of others. The manager publicly placed the blame for
Sergio Aguero’s goal at the Etihad stadium on Alberto Moreno to avoid
criticising his £20m signing. Apparently, Aguero walking on to the pitch,
jogging behind Lovren and leaving him for dead wasn’t as crucial to that goal
being conceded as our Spanish full back not getting tight enough to Jesus Navas
(on the half way line of all places!). Shifting the blame on to Moreno that day
when Lovren was clearly at fault set alarm bells ringing in my head. It appears
that Lovren is a player that Rodgers badly wanted and fought hard for this
summer and as a result he will defend him to hilt. We’ve seen precious little
in the way of criticism for the Croatian despite his numerous costly errors
while others have been hung out to dry or dropped from the side entirely for
less significant mistakes. It seems obvious to me that Lovren isn’t going to be
left out of the team anytime soon despite his wretched form. Rodgers has
invested a lot of money and a lot of hot air in his newest centre back and he’s
obviously one of the first names on the team sheet as things stand. Sakho fans
like myself will just have to lump it.
Fair enough. Rodgers knows a lot more about football than I
could ever hope to and he’s earned a bucket load of credit during his time as
manager. Hopefully the faith he has placed in the defender pays off in the long
run and Lovren improves. He drastically needs to, because right now he is the anointed
leader of a shambolic defence and that simply can’t continue if Liverpool are
serious about keeping their place in the top four this season.
If, as I expect, Lovren remains as the focal point of this
team’s back line then one would assume that Mamadou Sakho isn’t going to get
many games this season and will likely be off sooner or later. Considering the
qualities both players have shown to date that would represent somewhat of a
blunder for me. Sakho can be shaky now and then, but at least he’s shown
glimpses of the player he can become and he doesn’t cost his side a goal every
other game. I can fully see why Didier Deschamps puts faith in him for the
French national side.
Now we need to see something to justify why Brendan Rodgers
is placing the same kind of faith in Dejan Lovren because at the moment there
is precious little to suggest that preferring the Croatian at the expense of
Sakho when he returns from injury would be anything but folly.
Just as I’m sure that Didier Deschamps is, I remain
perplexed by Dejan Lovren’s standing in this Liverpool squad right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment