Monday, 14 May 2012

The Premier League's Best Season?

So the 'BEST SEASON EVER' had the most exhilarating finish imaginable. Every neutral could only bask in the magisterial, heart pounding action that took place yesterday. A day of football that had more twists and turns than the Monaco Grand Prix and climaxed with a moment so utterly unbelievable that we may never see the like again. It was Michael Thomas at Anfield. It was Liverpool in Istanbul. It was Manchester United in Camp Nou. It was a day that may well have altered the landscape of English football for the foreseeable future. No one could deny it's significance or the fantastically entertaining way that it all played out. Sky television have their sound bites for the next five years worth of Premier League adverts and fans of the Premier League have their smoking gun to prove that the Premier League is indeed 'the best league in the world'.  

Sergio Aguero wins City the title in the most dramatic way possible

This Premier League season has a seen a title race played out in scarcely believable conditions between two clubs from the same city. It has been a truly epic battle between the red and blue halves of Manchester and yesterday it had everyone on the edge of their seats right until the very end. However, the brilliantly entertaining war for Mancunian supremacy has allowed a lot of cracks to be papered over in terms of the overall quality of the Premier League.

When we sift through the understandable hyperbole that Sergio Aguero's 94th minute strike condemned us to yesterday afternoon and examine at the season as a whole, it is hard to escape the notion that England's top flight has regressed in terms of quality. At the beginning of the season the League looked extremely strong. The Manchester clubs were obvious favourites but Chelsea and Liverpool both had new faces and a new lease of life while Spurs were looking to continue from their excellent outing in the previous season. Doubts about Arsenal were cast but they belatedly spent money in the transfer market to boost their squad and people expected six strong sides to battle it out at the top end of the league. The six richest clubs in England all had reasons for optimism and a high quality league campaign looked very likely. It didn't quite happen like that though.

Setting aside the Manchester clubs for a moment, we come to third placed Arsenal who rallied well to secure guaranteed Champions League football next term. It is an achievement that the club should be proud of but this is an Arsenal team so dependent on their only world class player that if he leaves this summer they would be in all sorts of trouble. They have already lost three important players to Manchester City and Barcelona over the past year and Van Persie's exit would surely be a fatal blow to their future aspirations of glory. They have a shaky defence at best, little strength in depth and a dearth of attacking intelligence that has never been seen before in a team managed by Arsene Wenger. They are light years away from the elite sides in Europe and a shadow of the sides that the brilliant French manager has produced in the past. Van Persie's personal excellence and their ultimate eclipsing of Tottenham in the league has taken the limelight off the fact that this Arsenal side simply isn't very good.

Spurs, Arsenal's hated local rivals, secured 4th place despite a recent run of one win in eleven matches.  They burned like a shooting star for the first half of the season before combusting in spectacular fashion yet somehow still managed to stumble across the finish line in a Champions League qualifying position. Like Arsenal, they will face a fight to keep their main stars. Gareth Bale and Luka Modric will be in demand this summer and may well be tempted to seek employment elsewhere after an anticlimactic season. Their final (acceptable but not exceptional) league position owes more to the ever dwindling powers of Chelsea than their own performances.

Chelsea, a team that won the F.A Cup and may still lift the Champions League trophy yet conversely are clearly in huge decline. In jettisoning Andre Villas Boas mid season and installing Roberto Di Matteo, they abandoned their initial plan of a much needed full scale rebuilding job in order to squeeze the final signs of life from the remaining former stars of a once world class team. To Di Matteo's credit he has coaxed some phenomenal performances out of some old legs to bring them a domestic cup and to the edge of European glory. However, this Chelsea side are on a downward spiral and their league form proves it. Their main players who have helped maintain some success in cup competitions; Drogba, Lampard, Terry, Essien and the like can't go on forever. They haven't been able to cut the mustard on a consistent enough basis to ensure a top 4 finish this season which is a damning indictment of how far the club have fallen. They require major surgery in the summer and probably beyond and despite a heroic European run they are but a pale imitation of the exceptional sides that Jose Mourinho and Carlo Ancelotti led to glory. Regardless of whether they win in Munich next Saturday, this is the weakest Chelsea team of the Abromovich era by a large margin. They have been very poor in the league this season like most of the other 'big clubs'.

Mourinho's Chelsea are a distant memory at Stamford Bridge right now

On we go to England's other former powerhouse: Liverpool. A team that just 4 years ago was ranked as the number one performing side in Europe now resembles a boxer who has hit the deck and is struggling to get to his feet and regain his balance. Despite an encouraging end to last season under the returning Kenny Dalglish and a sizeable financial outlay over the past year and a half they have still finished behind Newcastle and Everton, teams with far less financial clout and much weaker squads. Under Rafa Benitez 3 seasons ago Liverpool amassed 86 points and lost only twice on route to almost winning the title. This year they have accumulated a paltry 52 points and tasted defeat on no less than 14 occasions. It isn't long ago that they we're beating the likes of Barcelona, Inter, Real Madrid and Milan in the European Cup. The simple fact is that they are no longer a top quality side capable of such victories and their priorities next season will be making sure that they can out do the likes of Swansea, Norwich and Fulham rather than planning for trips to the San Siro or Camp Nou. Liverpool's league campaign has been an unmitigated disaster.

After examining the underwhelming supporting cast we come back to Manchester. The two teams who provided us with such an entertaining end to the season are still no great shakes. It is testament to Alex Ferguson that he has amassed 89 points in the this league campaign. This team are no United vintage. Scholes and Giggs at the ages of 37 and 38 respectively remain their most consistent midfield performers. They have some talented young players like De Gea, Smalling, Jones and Wellbeck that offer hope for the future but right now United's relative success seems to be built upon the nous of their illustrious manager and their sheer strength of will rather than true star quality. They are still a very good team but they don't hold a candle to most of the United sides that have graced the Premier League over the past two decades. They have been outplayed by many teams in Europe this season and their crown is slipping despite the continued excellence of Ferguson in the dug out and Rooney on the pitch. This Manchester United outfit bares only a passable resemblance to Ferguson's former teams.

Finally we have Manchester City. The Champions. They have the strongest squad in the league by a distance and are deserving title winners. They may well now go on to dominate English football given their unparalleled wealth in this country.  However, the fact that they have only beaten a relatively weak United side on goal difference and their poor showing in Europe shows that they are still not ready to be considered a truly great team just yet. Early in the season it must be said that they did look the part. They were demolishing sides with some wonderful football and looked like they would win the title at a canter. However, in the second half of the season they began to falter and eventually they found themselves 8 points behind United who looked certain to win the league. Somehow, City fought back and won the title by showing incredible mental strength in the end rather than sweeping all before them as they did earlier in the campaign. It would take a brave man to bet against them now going on to become a true footballing super power but even on the evidence of this excellent season they are not yet in the same league as the likes of Barcelona or Real Madrid.

Which leads us on nicely to the Premier League's competition. First, La Liga. People have derided the Spanish league as merely a two team competition, 'a sunny SPL' scream the critics and while Barcelona and Madrid's dominance cannot be argued, it needs to be addressed in context. Barcelona and Real Madrid are in another footballing stratosphere right now. The fact that Chelsea managed to defy all footballing logic to squeeze past Barca and Bayern Munich produced a Titanic semi final effort to over come Real in the European Cup does not negate this. Barcelona are one of, if not the best team that have ever played the beautiful game while Madrid's strength in depth takes the breath away. When players like Kaka and Higuain warm the bench most weeks, you know that you are witnessing a special team. The two clubs have produced football that cannot be matched anywhere in the world this season and that is the reason for such a huge chasm from the top two teams to the rest in the Spanish league. You need only look at how well sides like Atletico Madrid and Athletic Bilbao have performed in Europe to see that the Spanish league contains other high quality sides. If you picked up the likes of Chelsea, Liverpool or Arsenal and placed them in La Liga it is doubtful that they would be able to get any closer to Madrid and Barca than the rest of the Spanish sides have. In England United and City ran away from the rest of the pack and in Spain Madrid and Barca did the same but the salient point is that Barca and Real did it with far more quality and style than their English counterparts.  

The best two players from the best two teams from the best league in the world

Over in Italy Juventus have just completed the astounding feat of winning the title while remaining unbeaten. After the horrendous Calciopoli incident, Juve are undoubtedly back. They have regained their place atop of Italian football and will launch an assault on the Champions League next season. AC Milan remain an ageing but powerful force and while Inter have fallen away this season, Serie A still boasts teams outside the top two that show up their English rivals. While the likes of Stoke prosper in the Premier League with their antiquated and frankly, insulting brand of 'football', sides such as Napoli, Bologna, Palermo and Udinese play with a fluency and tactical sophistication that is rarely witnessed on English shores. Serie A had appeared to lose it's way after the halcyon days of the 90's but it is a resurgent force that boasts a quality of football that is at least equal to that of the more hyped up Premier League.

Alex Del Piero bows out on top with Juventus

Finally, we have the Bundesliga. A league where a Bayern Munich team containing world class stars such as Neuer, Lahm, Schweinsteiger, Gomez, Robben and Ribery are merely second best. A league that is on a huge upward curve in terms of finance and leading the way in attendances. Borussia Dortmund now have a phenomenal side which, if they can fend of the circling vultures this summer, will only improve. They play a vibrant, highly technical and exciting brand of football on a relatively shoe string budget and while the Bundesliga isn't quite in the upper echelons yet it appears to be only a matter of time, especially given the recent T.V deal that will enable clubs to spend money on a more even keel to the Premier League clubs.

Arjen Robben's Bayern are only second best in Germany

While the Premier League may have had the most intriguing title race in years and produced some beguiling moments this season, the notion that it is the 'best league in the world' is merely a well promoted fallacy. The strongest clubs in the Premier League do not boast any more quality than those from abroad. The ultimate disparity of points from the Manchester clubs to the rest shows that it is no more a competitive league than Serie A, La Liga or the Bundesliga and in terms of quality of play it is debatable whether English football has any claim whatsoever to being the best. That said, despite the flaws, it has still be one hell of an exciting campaign. Roll on next season.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Dalglish's Dilemma - 'The Four Flops'

Stewart Downing, Jordan Henderson, Charlie Adam and Andy Carroll have cost Liverpool around £80m. Not one has had a successful full début season at Anfield. The idea of merely writing them off as a collective group of failures and moving them all on for huge financial loss would obviously be folly and will not happen but crucial decisions have to be made on all of them individually this summer. If all four players are still part of the Liverpool squad going in to next Premier League campaign it will be a surprise and a disappointment to most supporters.

Henderson: Technically sound but where is belief?

Of the four big money signings, Henderson is probably the safest bet to still be plying his trade at Anfield next season. He is still just 21 years old and has obvious technical ability. He has however, seemed to suffer from a chronic lack of confidence and people have questioned whether he has the mentality to make it on such a big stage as Liverpool. The confidence issue seems to have been compounded from being played on the right hand side of midfield, a role where he has looked at best uncomfortable and at worst totally lost. This is backed up by the fact that he has performed far better and looked far more at ease during the games where he has been moved into a more central position.

The problem that Henderson faces when it comes to winning over the supporters is that he simply doesn't stand out. 'What does he do?' is the oft asked question. He is neither a dominant ball winning defensive midfielder nor an attacking midfielder who looks like he will produce goals or assists on a regular basis. When you throw in the caveat that he is playing in a team that has severely lacked both of these qualities for much of the season his short comings have been made even more noticeable. In all fairness to Henderson though, he has never been and probably never will be a player that will prosper in such roles. His Liverpool career thus far seems to lend credence to the notion that he is a player who would thrive on being the middle man in a three man midfield. His energy and effective short passing would allow him to get up and down the pitch and link Liverpool's play together. Rather than being a player who will obviously excel to the masses, he seems destined to be one of the unsung midfielders that rarely receive praise in this country due to the understated role that they fill. It is a position that was perfected by Tiago at Chelsea during Jose Mourinho's first season in England. It is not a headline grabbing position, but in any variation of a 433 formation that all round midfielder is crucial and Henderson does seem to posses the required attributes and ability to do that job.

The question that Liverpool's manager must answer is whether he wants to play a system with 3 central midfielders because if that isn't the case then Henderson just doesn't serve much of a purpose to the side at the moment. If Dalglish wants his Liverpool team to play predominantly with just two players in central midfield then Henderson would have to try and alter his playing style and basically learn to play in a manner that does not come naturally to him. He can play centrally in a two man midfield right now but not effectively enough for a club like Liverpool. As suggested earlier, if Liverpool decide to play with just two central midfielders then Henderson would have to become either the overtly defensive or the more threatening attacking central midfielder that he has not yet looked like being. He could still play on the right of midfield as he has done predominantly this season of course, but he offers little attacking threat there also, due to his lack of any explosive pace or skill to beat opposing full backs. Sure, he'll keep the ball for you and maintain possession but he wont be looking to beat his man with any regularity and he doesn't posses the instincts of a player like Maxi Rodriguez who will start his runs from deep and end up in goals scoring positions.

Henderson has been somewhat of a victim of Liverpool's inconsistent tactical approach this season but that does not exempt him from criticism entirely. Whatever role Dalglish has asked him to fill, Henderson has rarely looked to impose himself on a game. He too often takes the easy option of a safe, short pass and rarely attempts to take the game by the scruff of the neck and drive his team forward. Perhaps this is down to his age and a lack of confidence on the big stage but it is a side to his game that badly needs to be improved upon. In comparison to Liverpool's other young midfielder Jonjo Shelvey (who has far less Premier League experience), Henderson is badly lacking an arrogant swagger in his game. Shelvey has much to prove still and may never make it at Anfield but he tries things and plays with a confidence and belief that belies his lack of top level footballing experience. When things don't come off for him he doesn't go into his shell, he simply tries again and again and this approach has impressed the Anfield faithful. If Henderson is to succeed at Liverpool it will not simply be a case of being played in a role or position that suits him but also because he eventually starts taking more responsibility.

The main saving grace for Henderson is that in today's cautious tactical climate the vast majority of teams play a variation of 433 these days (which often means that Liverpool must do the same, at least against high quality opposition and especially away from Anfield) and if a natural right sided player joins the club in the summer then Henderson will have more opportunities to play infield rather than out on the wing. Also, the fact is that despite the criticism of Henderson, Dalglish has more often than not found a place for him in his side regardless of the shape of the team or his form and that shows the huge confidence that his manager has in him. Henderson has the potential to forge out a successful career at Liverpool regardless of what his critics say but the next 12 months will be crucial  for him. He needs to take more risks, become more assertive and step up to the plate. He has a lovely first touch, can see a pass and has a great engine but he needs regular games in a position and system that suits him in order to flourish. Only then will people to able to decide whether he has been an expensive flop or a shrewd investment.

Charlie Adam's form dipped dramatically after a decent start at Anfield 
Charlie Adam signed for £6m from Blackpool and after a bright start to his Liverpool career he faded badly before injury cut his season short several weeks ago. It is notable that early in the season when he was performing well he had the experienced and tactically astute Lucas alongside him in midfield. Following Lucas' enforced absence through injury, Adam suffered more than most and went off the boil dramatically. Without Lucas carrying out his defensive duties in his exemplary manner alongside the Scot, Adam's negative aspects came to the fore. He was unable to cover sufficient ground in midfield to compensate for the Brazilian's absence (Jay Spearing essentially took Lucas' place and just isn't on the same level as the Brazilian which means more work was required from Adam) and he seemed incapable of simply having a steady game, which is often what is required of a central midfielder.

Contrary to popular belief, when Xabi Alonso filled a similar role during his time at Anfield he wasn't scoring from the half way line or producing breath taking moments every five minutes. Of course, he did do a lot of amazing things in a red shirt but one of Alonso's main qualities was the ability to simply make the right decisions and do what was required during matches, even if it wasn't particularly noticeable or eye catching. Sure, his exemplary technique and passing ability still made him stand out but it is Alonso's tactical nous and intelligence that Adam lacks most. Alonso would seldom have a poor game. He would do the things he was good at; maintain possession, make the right decisions when on the ball and anchor the midfield from a deep position.  Adam seems incapable of this and his lack of intelligence is the most disappointing part of his game.

He rarely has a consistent half hour let alone a consistent run of 9 or 10 games. He makes the wrong decisions when in possession of the ball far too often. He shoots when he should release the ball to a team mate, dribbles when he should shoot and attempts Hollywood balls when a simple pass will do. The raised arm of apology in acknowledgement of making a poor decision has been more of a common occurrence from Adam this season than anything else and he has frustrated the life out of the supporters.

Making comparisons with Xabi Alonso is slightly unfair on Adam of course. Alonso was (and remains) a world class operator and probably the best exponent of the deep lying play maker role in world football but Liverpool require players of comparable ability if they are to get back to where the were 4 years ago. They need consistent players and in midfield they need intelligence. Charlie Adam just doesn't appear to have the smarts to be a mainstay in a team aspiring to Champions League football.

It would be completely wrong to focus solely on Adam's short comings and it must be acknowledged that for a brief period of time he did have some relatively good games early in his Liverpool career. He has shown flashes of the ability that made him such a star for Blackpool and he does posses an extraordinary left foot that can pick out some sublime passes. The problem is that he doesn't do it on a regular basis. Adam is a mixed bag. Even when he plays well he will do 3 or 4 things in a match that will leave people shaking their heads and wondering what the hell he was attempting. Put simply, he is not a player that Liverpool can rely on at present. The return of Lucas and hopefully having Gerrard and Henderson available at the beginning of next season doesn't offer much hope for Adam's chances of cementing a regular birth in Dalglish's team and that is before you factor in the anticipated signing of another midfielder. If Adam is still a Liverpool player come the end of the summer transfer window then he is a likely to be a squad player at best. Whether he stays or goes probably depends on the player himself. If he is satisfied being a bit part player then he will stay and be a useful option for Dalglish when rotation of the squad is required, otherwise he will be quite easy for Liverpool to move on and the most likely of the four players to recoup their outlay on. It seems to me that unlike Henderson, Downing or Carroll, Charlie Adam must decide what his future holds rather than Liverpool FC or Kenny Dalglish.

 It's a shame that Downing doesn't seem to remember this sign when he's on the pitch
Stewart Downing, however you dress it up, has had an extremely disappointing season. It is hard for me to escape the notion that he needs to be moved on as he clearly does not have the temperament to play for a club like Liverpool. Approaching his 28th birthday, you would imagine that he should be in his prime and yet for most of the season he has resembled a teenager hiding on the margins of matches who doesn't quite yet have the courage of his convictions. It appears similar to the crisis of confidence that Jordan Henderson has suffered, the belief isn't there. Such a lack of confidence is understandable in Henderson, he's a young man who has been asked to play out of position an awful lot and is being asked to perform on the biggest stage he has ever encountered in his career. For Downing however, there can be no such concessions made and patience is wearing increasingly thin with him at Anfield.

Downing is an established England international who has amassed over a decades worth of experience in the Premier League. Having watched him over the course of his career and obviously particularly closely this season, it is clear that the talent is there but the personality is unmistakably lacking. He has had a lot of average to decent games but for a £20m winger playing for Liverpool Football Club that is not close to being good enough. He has effectively produced a much more expensive left footed re-enactment of Jermaine Pennant's Liverpool career.  

He was likely signed to supply Andy Carroll with service from wide areas and while acknowledging that he has put in some excellent service at times he has failed to do so on a consistent basis. Also, in the big games against the best full backs in the country can any Liverpool fan really say with any confidence that they expect Downing to be effective? He just doesn't seem to have it in his locker to try and beat a full back regularly which, for a winger, is criminal. In big games he is far more likely to hide away out on the touchline, laying the ball inside and playing five yard passes to his left back every time he gets it rather than attempting to beat his marker. His display at Old Trafford this season summed up his Liverpool career. He didn't make any glaring errors but until he was substituted you barely realised he was on the pitch.

In their need to progress, Liverpool require players with bottle and talent, not just one of those commodities.   They can perhaps afford to show patience with younger players as they develop these qualities but surely they can not do so with experienced campaigners like Downing. Not having enough confidence or belief is understandable when you are a player making your way in the game but when you are an seasoned international footballer displaying such mental fragility then it leaves you in big trouble. Unfortunately it appears that Downing just doesn't fit the bill and Liverpool must be seriously considering taking the financial hit on the winger and selling him on while they still can. Perhaps it would be better to have a few million pounds in the bank than waiting and hoping for a winger approaching 30 to suddenly find a level of performance that has thus far eluded him throughout his career.


Andy Carroll: Much improved but will he ever fit in at Anfield?

Andy Carroll. Ah, Andy Carroll. For the first half of this season he looked like a donkey dragging the weight of every pound coin of his price tag behind him in a carriage. His fitness, touch and application were all in question. In recent months however, his attitude and general improvement means that he must be given some credit.

He has shown a stomach for the fight that players like Downing and Henderson have not offered. It would have been easy for him to give up after all the stick that he has taken and the stories that Liverpool reportedly tried to offload him in January, yet he has stuck to his task and upped his work rate noticeably. His link up play and fitness have both improved and while he will never be worth the absurd £35m fee that Liverpool so recklessly spent on him , he has at least resembled a decent football player of late.

The problem Liverpool have is that Carroll needs to be playing in a team built to suit his style. He needs to play week in week out to maintain his sharpness and confidence and he requires the kind of service from out wide that Liverpool simply do not posses in their ranks. Stewart Downing is the only out and out winger at the club and has failed to give Carroll high quality service on a regular basis. Steven Gerrard is the only player in Liverpool's squad who has the ability to consistently pick Carroll out with crosses but he is used in a central role, therefore for much of the season Carroll has had to make do with the inconsistent crosses that the likes of Dirk Kuyt, Jose Enrique and Craig Bellamy have been providing. It has not been to his advantage that Liverpool seemingly signed a specialist target man while often attempting to play football that totally negates his style of play.

The monetary loss if Liverpool were to sell Carroll would be huge but if he is not to be the focal point of their team then his value will only diminish further as the months and years roll on. It's a tough decision to make and I honestly wouldn't like to have to make it. Carroll is young and has shown admirable determination to give himself the best opportunity of succeeding at Anfield but if Liverpool want to go in an opposite tactical direction then what purpose does it serve to keep Carroll at the club? Surely you cannot justify keeping a man who cost £35m as a squad player or a plan B option.

If Carroll is in the team it appears that he needs a striker alongside him to be at his most effective. He can't play as a lone striker who will often be isolated because he does not posses the pace, power or energy of someone like a Didier Drogba or a peak Fernando Torres. Essentially he is a forward who needs to be playing in a system with 2 wingers and a strike partner alongside him. The problematic point regarding this is that if he is playing, his strike partner is going to be Luis Suarez and while the two have developed a decent understanding of late, Suarez is at his best when he has forward players around him who posses intelligent movement, pace and technique. For Uruguay Suarez will often play as a wide forward with Edison Cavani and Diego Forlan in the team but all three will naturally move in to more central areas when they attack. While Carroll would much prefer to have two wingers keeping the play stretched and whipping balls into an area that he can profit from, Suarez excels when he has supporting players close to him in the centre of the pitch.   The partnership with Suarez and Carroll is not natural and it is to their credit that they have become a relatively decent combination when played together but neither compliments the other like the best strike partnerships do.

 Carroll, Dalglish and Suarez:  Together, but for how long?
To strike a balance with Suarez and Carroll in the team is not impossible and they have proved that they can play well together to a certain extent, but it will be difficult to regularly incorporate them both into a system that will extract the best from both players, especially when Steven Gerrard is thrown into the equation. When Gerrard, Suarez and Carroll all started against Everton in the league game at Anfield they played exceptionally well, but the opposition's tactics were accommodating to Liverpool that night. Everton played an open style of football, often with just two central midfielders that prevented them from outnumbering Liverpool in the middle of the park and thus negating Gerrard's forward runs. Most teams would not set up in such a tactically naive manner if Liverpool played with all 3 players. The majority of teams come to Anfield and look to outnumber Liverpool in midfield and restrict the space that Gerrard has to work his magic in attacking areas and then you are left with Carroll and Suarez becoming more isolated which is particularly detrimental to the Uruguayan's style of play. Playing two out and out forwards like Suarez and Carroll is also very risky when you go away from home or play against a top level side which is the reason that Dalglish has varied the teams formation so often this season and thus relegated Carroll to the bench in games against better sides regardless of how well he has performed in the preceding matches.

Getting the absolute best out of Carroll is something Liverpool have failed to do this season and if they can't find a way of doing so without compromising the teams style of play and the effectiveness of their best two players (Gerrard and Suarez ) then next season may prove to be equally as stop start and frustrating for Carroll as this term has. He is a good player who is useful to Liverpool but Dalglish must decide whether he could use any funds from the sale of Carroll to get more out his Liverpool team next season.

In conclusion, the most important factor that will determine the future of these four players is Liverpool's need to settle on a primary formation and style of play. As the season has progressed it has become increasingly difficult to predict the line up and formation that Dalglish will pick. Liverpool switch from a short passing style with Suarez as the false 9 spearhead to a conventional and more direct 442 with Carroll partnering their number 7 up front. Dalglish chooses different systems based on the opposition's strength and whether Liverpool are playing at Anfield or not. It has contributed to a lack of coherence in the side's play in my opinion.

Dalglish must settle on a preferred style of play and formation next season
Under Rafa Benitez Liverpool seldom deviated from their 4231 formation. They had Torres playing the lone strikers role to perfection up front, Steven Gerrard supporting him from a position at the top of a midfield three, a defensive midfielder and a play maker in the centre of the park looking to control the tempo of the match and two wide midfielders, one who would often maintain width (like Jermaine Pennant or Albert Riera) while the other looked to come inside and link up with the front two (like Yossi Benayoun or Luis Garcia). This year there has been no such obvious game plan.

There is no set pattern or rhythm to Liverpool's play and it is obvious that the players are suffering from it. Having options and the ability to surprise the opposition with the shape of your team is to be commended (Dalglish and Benitez have both used 3 and 5 at the back to great effect in the past for example) but the side must have a regular method to their play in order to form partnerships and gain a proper understanding of what is required from them on the pitch on a game by game basis.

Under Benitez the side changed almost every game in terms of personnel but the players who were on the pitch always knew their duty. Mascherano knew his role as the workhorse screening the back four, Alonso knew he was expected to keep the ball moving and supply the forwards with quick, incisive passes, Riera knew he was in the team to maintain width and Kuyt knew he was expected to get up and down the opposite flank every game as well as get into the box where ever possible. Liverpool were a cohesive outfit and that is lacking now and when Dalglish and the owners sit down and discuss whether the four afore mentioned signings are to stay or go come the summer I hope it is done with a clear plan of how the team and its players are expected to play next season. Clarity is needed and big decisions have to be taken.


Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Hodgson will fail with England - History tells us it was ever thus.


'Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it' - George Santayana

Roy Hodgson is a competent football manager who has found his level again at West Bromwich Albion over the past season and a half. He is not a manager capable of taking on the enormous pressures of a nation that is so starved of and desperate for success as England. He will fail as England manager and the treatment he will receive from the press and supporters will be cruel and excruciating to watch. How do I know this? Because I've already seen it happen. We all have.

Imagine for a moment that you are an employer seeking a new employee to fill a vital role in your organisation. The first C.V that you pick up contains a vast amount of experience in the field that you require. Assuming experience is almost a pre requisite for the post you are advertising, what would be the next things that you look for? Having never been in such a position myself you will have to indulge me while take a few guesses. I would look for jobs that the applicant had done in the past that resembled as closely as possible the role that he or she would be taking on in my organisation. I would be looking into previous jobs that the applicant had listed that demanded similar levels of ability in a similar environment to the position I need to fill. I would look to see how the applicant dealt with circumstances likely to occur in the position that he or she would be taking on and crucially, whether he or she left such a post as a success or a failure.  

Apparently I am wrong. The Football Association's imminent selection of Roy Hodgson as the next England manager completely rejects my hypothetical method of selecting an employee. I know this, because on Roy Hodgson's C.V there is a huge, glaring warning sign that jumps off the page and shows with plenty of evidence why he should not, ever, be considered for such a demanding job as that of the England football team manager.

Upon the anticipated official announcement of Roy Hodgson to his role as the next manager of the national team his apologists in the media will go into overdrive to tell you that Roy is the right man to take his country forward and will point to the relatively recent success he has enjoyed at West Brom and Fulham. Conversely, they will likely ignore or downplay the recent period of his career that is most significant and relevant to his new job. His time as manager of Liverpool Football Club will be brushed under the carpet and labelled as an aberration in his career.

To dismiss Hodgson's stint at Liverpool or even ignore it is beyond stupidity. That the F.A have seemingly placed a negligible amount of importance on his run as manager of the most successful English football club in history, is amazing. His time as Liverpool manager should have been highlighted, examined and poured over long and hard. I can only assume based on the fact that Hodgson has been approached by the F.A to take over as England manager that, staggeringly, it was not.  

The period he spent on Merseyside remains the only job he has had in the past decade that is surrounded with the same expectations and pressures of the England post that he will soon inherit. It is the only job that he has taken on in recent times that carries with it the same intense media scrutiny that goes with being manager of this country. It is the only job that he has had since he left Inter Milan in 1999 where he had the opportunity to work with world class footballers. In short, it is obvious that the Liverpool job was the only one in the past ten years that is remotely comparable to the task that he is about to undertake. Most importantly, it is imperative to remember how that job panned out for him.

He failed. Miserably.  

The revisionists among the press have recently peddled the idea that Roy was on a hiding to nothing when he walked in to Anfield, that it was an impossible job, that the fans didn't want him and subsequently showed him no patience when things didn't go well. All are fair points but only to a degree. Liverpool were a club crippled by it's cowboy owners and the fans did want Kenny Dalglish in the hot seat rather than Roy. However, it is my recollection as a Liverpool fan myself that few supporters were particularly perturbed by Hodgson's arrival. Most saw him as a steady, uninspiring, 'know what you're going to get' kind of appointment and were willing to give him a chance. The problem was that no Liverpool supporter had anticipated what they were actually going to receive from Hodgson and how out of his depth he would be.

To have had a bad start at Liverpool results wise was understandable. They were not a great side despite some undoubted high quality players within their ranks and they had finished a lowly 7th in the previous Premier League season. Importantly though, it was not just the terrible results that sealed Roy's fate (Liverpool were close to being sucked into a relegation battle at the time of his departure lest we forget). It was the breath-taking media quotes, the absurd ostracising and public criticising of key players, the inability to grasp what Liverpool Football Club meant and perhaps most significantly the outdated style of football that his team were made to practise.



Hodgson's supporters point to the fact that his successor Kenny Dalglish, despite a poor 2011/2012 league season, has been afforded far more time and understanding than Hodgson ever got and this is true, but again there are significant mitigating circumstances. Under Hodgson Liverpool routinely lost games where they were completely dominated by inferior sides while producing stale, uninspiring football week in week out. There seemed little emphasis placed on any tactical flexibility or exciting, imaginative, attacking play. Even when they won games it was uninspiring fare that was served up to the Anfield masses. That is not something that Dalglish's Liverpool side can be accused of. They have their faults (mainly profligacy) but they are rarely as poor as the Liverpool that belonged to Hodgson and they play with an attacking verve that is light years beyond anything produced by Hodgson's team. They have also won one and have the chance to win the other domestic cup competition. Hodgson's team were edging close to a relegation battle and were also disgracefully eliminated from the League Cup at home to a Northampton side described by Hodgson himself as 'formidable opponents'.

That was just one jaw dropping quote among dozens that left Liverpool fans aghast as to who the man leading their famous club actually was. Below is a direct link to the excellent 'Hodge Files' for those who need a reminder of the garbage that was released from his mouth during his time on Merseyside. For those who don't need to be reminded I suggest you revisit the quotes anyway because some are solid comedy gold.


It is frankly amazing to me that just 18 months after his horrific failure at Liverpool that the F.A could appoint Roy Hodgson as the next England manager. Surely the selection committee assembled to appoint the man to take England into the Euro's must have looked at what an unmitigated disaster his time at the biggest job in his career was? Surely they would have looked into how badly he reacted to criticism during his time at a huge club and how he crumbled under the pressure in the most spectacular way imaginable? Surely they could not afford to ignore the chronic lack of any proactive tactics and his failure to adequately manage and get the best out of the top class players at his disposal? If they required evidence to see whether a manager will sink or swim when the going gets tough in a highly pressurised job then Hodgson's time at Liverpool was the perfect example they needed to decide that he is undoubtedly the wrong man for such a position as England manager.  



Instead, the F.A have seemingly decided to completely ignore Hodgson's time at Liverpool and have again demonstrated their lack of foresight and displayed their inability to competently run English football. They have replaced one of the most successful managers of any generation in Fabio Capello with a man whose career highlights are so insignificant in comparison that they aren't even worth listing here.  

I will watch Hodgson's time as England manager with the morbid fascination of passing by a car wreckage. As soon as things start to go wrong and results head south I anticipate that the pressure will become so great on Hodgson that his press conferences and interviews will descend into farce and become excruciatingly painful to behold. He will be made fun of by the tabloids for his quirky physical reactions on the touchline when things go against his side (previous classics such as head banging and face rubbing will undoubtedly be surpassed if England fall at the first hurdle in Poland/Ukraine this summer). He will cut a lonely isolated figure, evoking memories of the numerous occasions where he sat in the Anfield dugout like a rabbit in the headlights. He is so obviously the wrong man for the England job that the mere suggestion it when he left Liverpool 18 months ago would bring roaring laughter from all and sundry. Now, astonishingly, that situation is about to become reality.

If you are one of the millions who will be watching Roy Hodgson lead England into Euro 2012 on your television then I suggest you do it from a position behind your couch because it is not going to be pleasant viewing. Like the F.A, you have been warned.

Sunday, 15 April 2012

Evertonian class made Saturday the real final.

To my mind this season's F.A Cup is all but finished. Sure, there is one game left to play when Liverpool meet Chelsea but whatever happens on May 5th, the abiding memories of this season's competition were cemented in my conscience on Saturday.

Sunday's football schedule was depressing fare all round. From Ashley Young's latest ludicrous tumbling act, to Chelsea and Manchester United fans disgracing their clubs, to the unfathomable goal that never was for Juan Mata, the whole day just seemed to strip bare the current wounds of football and poke at them with a sharp object. However, I'd rather not focus on the numerous distasteful aspects of yesterdays matches here, and casting my mind back just 24 hours further allows a smile to wash over my face.

Of course, it's much easier to say this when your team wins a derby at Wembley and books their place in a final, but the sense of pride that Saturday brought runs deeper than the 2-1 scoreline. Liverpool as a city put on a show of footballing class, dignity and respect that the all London semi final could not begin to compete with. 

In their infinite wisdom, the powers that be decided that due to the perceived unsavoury nature of the Merseyside derby, a ludicrous kick off time of 12.30 was required to help minimise trouble between blue and red fans. The game's early start meant that supporters would have to take the 200 mile trip to Wembley at ungodly hours to ensure their attendance and wouldn't be able to 'hit the booze' in the pubs due to the early kick off time (little do they know that a 4am crate of lager on a bus to a scouser is seen as an added bonus rather than a deterrent).  

There were a lot of anxious people wondering how well the two sides of the city would represent themselves on the grand stage in London and some apprehension surrounded the match in the preceding days. They needn't have worried. The collective appreciation of a Merseyside great in Gary Ablett was moving. The solidarity displayed by Evertonians when they held aloft their numerous 'DON'T BUY THE SUN' banners was inspiring. The impeccable respect shown during the minutes silence for the 96 victims of the Hillsborough tragedy was the perfect example of why Merseyside had put on a spectacle that no other city in England would have been capable of. Before the tribalism began at kick off both sides had displayed a faultless show of togetherness for their city and it's sons and daughters who couldn't be there with them. 

For all the ills that have befallen the 'friendly derby' in recent years, Saturday felt like a huge step in the right direction. There have been other shoots of recovery in recent times such as Z-Cars blasting out at Anfield for little Rhys Jones (if the video below doesn't bring a tear to your eye then you're not human) and Evertonians behaviour at Wembley on Saturday was thankfully in stark contrast to the vile, classless scenes witnessed in the same arena on Sunday night.



Comparing the two semi finals almost seems unfair on Chelsea and Tottenham but compare I will. Reds and blues from Liverpool travelled together through the night all the way down to the nations capital, they filled the entire stadium and could have done so two or three times over. They behaved immaculately, showed respect where is was due, cheered their respective teams on for 90 minutes and then left. The lasting memories of the day will be the mutual appreciation of Ablett, the minutes silence, Carroll's redemption, Brad Jones' deserved moment of joy and Distin's moving apologies. The football wasn't always of the highest quality but the application and the mood surrounding the occasion was. It was a proper semi final day with two proper clubs and two fantastic sets of supporters. The winners left elated and the losers deflated but back home they all went together.

Fast forward 30 hours and a London derby between two of the countries best teams staged in their own back yard was an all round embarrassing farce. Chelsea's fans couldn't even be to bothered to fill their end of the stadium. Apparently travelling across their own city was too much of an arduous journey for Londoners to make on a Sunday evening. If that wasn't bad enough, a minutes silence on the 23rd anniversary of one of the worst moments in the history of English football was ruined. Sickening chants of 'murderers' and boos rang around Wembley for the brief moment of 'silence' for Hillsborough before it was mercifully cut short. We then had the sight of numerous players from Chelsea playing in the game having seemingly jettisoned their black armbands given to them to commemorate the 96 victims. Words like shameful and disgusting come to mind. It was everything that the previous day's semi final wasn't.  



It was all the proof needed that even if Fernando Torres smashes in a last minute wonder goal to hand Chelsea the trophy in 3 weeks time, this years F.A Cup has already been defined by Liverpool's two footballing giants. From a personal perspective, Saturday was everything that derby day should be (minus a ticket to the match of course!). A group of friends divided in their loyalties came together, watched the match, had a laugh and stayed out for the night without a hint of bother. Evertonians offered their insincere congratulations, Reds offered their insincere condolences, jokes were shared, banter flew and everyone had a drink and moved on. It was a day that was shared together and felt like an occasion for everyone. We might not like each others managers, players or clubs in a footballing sense and some arguments will forever rumble on but for that afternoon it felt how I imagined the 1989 final did.  

It may sound patronising and as I said earlier it is very easy to reflect favourably on the day when your team are victorious but the respect I have personally for Everton and their fans was increased significantly this weekend. Most blues I know already had my respect of course. Some have sat with me at the Hillsborough memorial services, none of them buy S*n and the banter is nearly always friendly yet Saturday took it a notch up for me. They behaved in a manner befitting of their club's history and showed precisely why they are a truly 'big club', something that teams like Chelsea will never be, despite all their riches. They handled the sensitivity of the Hillsborough anniversary with the utmost class from top to bottom while never sacrificing their desire to see their fierce rivals beaten. To the average Liverpool fan like myself that means a lot. They dealt with the hollowness of defeat with dignity and despite the fact that they won't be in the final, they left a bigger impression on this year's competition with their behaviour on Saturday than Chelsea could ever dream of doing on May 5th.

No matter how much bile has been spewed over recent years or how much the two clubs have seemed to drift apart, one thing always reminds me of the way Liverpool and Everton should be regardless of the understandable rivalry. In the first derby after Hillsborough a banner was held aloft in the Liverpool end of Goodison park. It was thank you gesture for the support of Everton in the wake of the disaster that read simply 'LFC THANKS EFC WE NEVER WALKED ALONE'. On Saturday it felt like that. Both clubs strode into London side by side and showed everyone why Liverpool is the greatest footballing city our country has.



  


Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Why simulation in football is here to stay


The Easter programme of Premier League football has crystallized two things: British players love a dive as much as their foreign counterparts and the F.A have proven they they are ill equipped to tackle the issue of simulation head on. 

At Old Trafford on Sunday we saw England international and serial diver Ashley Young produce his coup de grace when he effectively won Manchester United another vital 3 points just ten minutes into their game against Queens Park Rangers. Running into the box, the forward felt a slight brush of Shaun Derry's hand on his torso and hit the deck faster than Muhammed Ali did when Joe Frazier's left hook nearly took his head off at Madison Square Garden back in 1971. A penalty was awarded and Derry was dismissed thus all but ending QPR's already slim chances of gaining a point in their struggle for Premiership survival. It was the latest in a long line of hitherto unpunished theatrics from Young, though he is not alone. Despite the numerous acts of simulation from high profile England players over many years (from Steven Gerrard's star fish impersonations to Wayne Rooney and Michael Owen's penchant for falling over invisible obstacles) we still have the myth peddled to us that foreign players are the the major perpetrators of this unpalatable side of the beautiful game.



Since James Perch and Andy Carroll (both English) embarrassed themselves at St. James' Park last week there has been a media clamouring to kick out diving once and for all. It appears to have served only to make referee's more unsure of themselves and trigger happy. For example, in the subsequent two matches Liverpool have played since the diving debacle at Newcastle, three yellow cards have been dished out for simulation by referees. None were merited. Craig Bellamy, Luis Suarez and Aston Villa's Samir Carruthers were all fouled and yet punished for 'diving'. It smacks of referee's responding to the latest media storm surrounding the game. Diving has replaced racism as the latest media hot potato in football. It is difficult to blame the match officials for being overzealous in these instances given the pressure that is on them. If they miss a blatant dive at the moment then it will be highlighted and they will likely be punished for it themselves. When you see players week in week out trying to con referee's and doing so in such skilled and subtle ways, one wonders what chance the match officials have of discerning whether a player has indeed been impeded or whether he is the latest in a long line of players to seek an advantage for his team by any means necessary.

This is where the F.A come in. A solution needs to be found, not to eliminate diving (that has always and will always be a part of football when you consider the environment the game is played, what is at stake and the fact that players are human and will make mistakes in split second decisions) but to punish the serial offenders. Some players are already indirectly punished on a regular basis due to their reputations that high profile figures in the game and our nations media have helped to forge. Luis Suarez for example, publicly branded a 'diver' by that honourable knight of the realm Mr. Ferguson (the same man who asserted that Shaun Derry 'had to be sent off' at Old Trafford in light of Young's terrible dive) was denied a cast iron penalty in the Liverpool - Aston Villa game this weekend. If he had been Steven Gerrard, Gareth Bale, Ashley Young or any other trustworthy good old British boy he would likely have had the penalty he deserved. His reputation undoubtedly went before him but unfairly so as he was obviously impeded. Plenty of British players have outdone Suarez in the diving stakes this season yet their reputations remain untarnished.  

Gareth Bale has gone to ground more often than Audley Harrison does this season yet he doesn't have the reputation that foreign players like Suarez have because our unbiased, none xenophobic media choose to brush such instances under the carpet. Has Ashley Young been vilified this week? Has Alex Ferguson been called out on his ridiculous myopia and hypocrisy after his comments about the Young incident? Of course not. When Roberto Mancini waves an imaginary card at a referee he is branded a disgrace to his profession, when Alex Ferguson slams players like Torres and Suarez for diving with no evidence and subsequently ignores flagrant cheating from his players our nation's journalists simply turn their heads away and ignore the situation for fear of being banned from Old Trafford should they dare to speak the truth.

As a result we have some players who dive a lot (mainly foreign players) who are punished by referee's due to their public image while other consistent cheats (mainly British players) get decisions going their way. Essentially, the media created perceptions of players are carried onto the pitch by referee's and affect their judgement. This is why the F.A need to implement some sort ruling that retrospectively punishes the players who dive and they need to do it quickly. Ashley Young's dive at the weekend had a significant impact on the survival hopes of QPR and the title race between Man United and Man City. This isn't right. There are variables in football matches that we cannot control but diving isn't one of them. Retrospective bans, highlighting the serial offenders in a consistent manner (rather than our media and ex players merely blaming it on 'johnny foreigner' or the latest media hate figure) and hefty fines would all seem like reasonable and logical steps to improve our game. Unfortunately there is a huge bump in the road obstructing this approach: The Football Association.




Ah, the good old F.A. The seekers of truth and justice in our national game. Destroyers of the ills that befall and besmirch the sport. They covered themselves in glory again this weekend. While the steps mentioned above to help minimize simulation in our game would seem to be universally endorsed by football fans and pretty easy to install, the incompetence of our F.A (the organisation that we would entrust the implementation of any such initiatives to) stands in the way.

This weekend the F.A had two big decisions to make. Both seemed simple enough and two wrongs could have been corrected. First, Shaun Derry's red card at Old Trafford was understandably appealed by his club. It was a fairly open and shut case. Derry's hand had grazed Young shirt, the forward felt contact and decided to cheat to win a penalty. It was not a foul by Derry, anyone with two eyes could see that yet our wonderful F.A have decided that the defender DOES deserve to serve a suspension for 'denying a goalscoring opportunity'.  Who knew that brushing someone with your palm could deny a goal?  

That decision seems illogical, barely conceivable and laughable in it self but fear not because the F.A had a chance to deal out some real justice with a case this weekend that was possibly even more cut and dried. At the Emirates stadium later on Easter Sunday, Mario Balotelli produced one of the worst 'tackles' of the season. Half heartedly chasing a loose ball the Italian forward raised his right boot a foot off the ground and raked his studs down Arsenal's Alex Song's right knee. The Cameroonian midfielder was lucky not have had his leg broken and it was a shocking challenge that merited a red card. Somehow the match day officials failed to punish Balotelli. 



The F.A decided that they could not retrospectively punish Balotelli as 'at least one of the match officials had seen the incident'. I accept that this is a FIFA implemented ruling, but that doesn't make it right. Balotelli could have snapped Song's leg in half and yet the F.A allowed him to get away with it Scott free. It is yet more compelling evidence that such a ruling needs to be scrapped and the F.A need to have the balls to confront FIFA on the rulings obvious deficiencies. Given their track record regarding their lack of backbone I won't hold my breath.  

For all the pining for changes in the game such as the introduction of goal line technology, retrospective analysis of simulation and the like, what would be the point if we were trusting this organisation with such huge responsibilities? They can't even get the simple things right. There isn't a player or fan in football who saw the two instances cited above the same way that our F.A did. There were no shades of grey, there was no doubt over either decision. The Football Association are getting simple things so wrong that it makes you wonder how badly they would screw up any potential major changes to our game. In all probability the media furore around diving will die down soon enough and the F.A will be able to keep their heads buried in the sands down at Soho Square. Given the staggering levels of incompetence that they have exhibited this season alone, perhaps accepting that simulation is here to stay is the only way forward. Would the F.A retrospectively deciding on whether a player has dived or not really solve the issue when they believe that Shaun Derry denied Ashely Young a goal scoring chance on Sunday?  

Diving should not be tolerated in our game as it is morally corrupt but when the alternative is placing your trust in an equally morally corrupt and an also astoundingly incompetent organisation then maybe, unfortunately it is the lesser of two evils.