I don't like Stoke City very much. I
find them boring and uninspiring to watch. I don't appreciate
constant long diagonal punts up field. Watching the clock tick away
dozens of time per match as balls are wiped with towels and set
pieces are prepared meticulously isn't my bag either. I don't find
their physical approach easy on the eye, but most importantly, I don't
like it when Liverpool have to play against them because I know it
will be a tough game for the Reds to win. Say what you will about
Stoke (I often do), but they are a team you can set your watch by.
Liverpool conceded three times against them on Boxing Day. The first
goal came from a long punt and flick on, the second from a corner and
the third was from a long throw. Quelle suprise. The fact that
Liverpool seemed ill equipped to deal with such obvious tactics was
alarming but more frustrating still was the Reds inability to impose
their contrasting style of play on their opponents throughout the
game. Was that really a shock though?
Stoke are a team that have been pieced
together in their managers image over several years. Tony Pulis knows
how he wants his team to play, he knows what is effective and he has
purchased footballers who will carry out his instructions
consistently. The fact that these instructions are winning headers,
being first to second balls, hitting percentage 'diagonals' and
generally working as hard as humanely possible rather than attempting
to play dazzling one touch pass and move football doesn't matter. The
point remains that over a period of time Tony Pulis has assembled a
squad that is able to successfully implement his preferred style of
play. It doesn't matter that his team play unattractive football, all
that matters is that they are doing exactly what their manager wants
them to.
Conversely, Brendan Rodgers' group of
players contains many who seem at odds with his football style.
Whether or not his philosophy will ultimately be successful remains
to be seen, but calls for his sacking (and there have been some, lets
not kid ourselves) and the growing lack of faith in his management at
such an embryonic stage in his Liverpool career is depressing and
unfortunately symptomatic of the modern day game. Time is hard to
come by for managers these days, especially at Anfield.
Liverpool haven't done as well as they
should have this season in terms of league position, no one can
dispute that and Rodgers has made mistakes, sometimes very important
ones that have cost his team points (in my opinion). But cast your
mind back 6 months and most Liverpool fans were applauding the notion
of having a young manager with a vision. Excitement surrounded the
appointment of the softly spoken Northern Irishman who had a definitive idea of how he wanted Liverpool to play going forward. 6 league
defeats later and the goodwill and talk of steady progress over time
is quickly evaporating.
Rodgers needs more time |
Rodgers inherited a club that had been outside the top 6 under the stewardship of Rafa Benitez, Roy Hodgson and Kenny Dalglish over the past 3 seasons and then lost important players like Maxi Rodriguez, Dirk Kuyt and Craig Bellamy in the summer. Is it any wonder Liverpool are barely hanging on to the coat tails of the teams fighting for fourth place when you look at it like that?
It's hard to swallow for Kopites but
under FSG there is going to be no quick fix no matter what manager is
at the helm. Joh Henry and co are apparently unwilling to sanction
the huge transfer fees and ludicrous wages that would give Liverpool
an opportunity to immediately begin to challenge the top clubs again.
Whatever reservations are held about the clubs American owners, in
the summer they appointed a manager who they believed could bring
success within their business model. They didn't move for a Harry
Redknapp style manager and seek a quick fix, they appointed a 39 year
old with a clearly defined plan for the future which (like every
manager in world football) was not guaranteed to work.
They put their faith in Brendan Rodgers
and so did the supporters of Liverpool. So, given that most reds on
Merseyside this summer embraced the notion of introducing more youth
team players and building for the future with slow steady progress
under a new manager is it not just a little short sighted for people
to be condemning Rodgers as a failure after half a season and only 2
first team additions to the playing staff (one of whom has been
injured for most of the season)?
Liverpool are a team who have finished
between 6th and 8th for the past three seasons.
A return to the Champions League is their obvious objective but the
chances of it happening this season were only remote to begin with
and with the criminal loss to Aston Villa and the surrender at Stoke
it now seems outlandish that Liverpool will finish in the top four.
But would it be asking too much to give this new manager another
transfer window or two to actually bring in players to the club who
actually fit his style of play and to wait and see if improvement
occurs?
Daniel Sturridge is on his way from
Chelsea, and while he may not be everyone's cup of tea, does anyone
seriously think that he wouldn't have provided more league goals than
Raheem Sterling (one), Stewart Downing (one), Jose Enrique (one) or
Suso (zero) have this season? Joe Cole, Stewart Downing, Jordan
Henderson and the like aren't players that fit Rodgers system right
now and he must be given time to acquire players who will before he
is judged. Like Rodgers, Liverpool supporters want to see their team
playing attractive, passing football and winning games. Why not give
the man who intends to make this dream a reality the time and players
to do it before getting on his back?
If you buy into a philosophy and a long
term plan then you have to accept that it is likely going to take a
while to perfect. Stoke are one of the best defensive sides in Europe
this season and that didn't happen over night. It happened because
Tony Pulis, a man whose footballing philosophy I wholeheartedly
disagree with, was allowed time to work with the players at his
disposal and gradually mould a team in his image over numerous
transfer windows. Giving Brendan Rodgers the same opportunity might
just be an idea.